US Tech Giants Under Fire: The Final Stand for Anti-Trust and Data Privacy Rights
San Francisco, USA – February 10, 2026
This report explores the clash between the unregulated power of Silicon Valley and the emerging judicial demands for privacy and accountability—a battle that will define the sovereignty of the individual in the digital age.
— The long-standing hegemony of Silicon Valley is facing its most significant legal reckoning to date.
As of February 2026, the US Supreme Court has shifted its focus to the “Video Privacy Protection Act” (VPPA), with the landmark case Salazar v. Paramount Global set to determine whether digital subscriptions grant users the same privacy protections as traditional consumers.
This comes at a time when the Department of Justice (DOJ) is aggressively pursuing the “structural separation” of Google’s ad-tech business—a move that could mark the first forced divestiture of a major tech platform in decades.
The era of “digital lawlessness” is being challenged by a global demand for(governance) that respects the sanctity of personal data.
The Monopoly of Information and the “Ego” of the Algorithm
The current antitrust landscape in the US is a battlefield of ideologies. While the FTC recently faced setbacks in its retrospective challenge to Meta’s acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram, the DOJ’s victory in the Google search case has set a powerful precedent.
However, the “remedies” phase, currently unfolding in early 2026, has been criticized by experts as a “slap on the wrist.”
This failure to impose meaningful structural change reflects a “Second Mind” hesitation—a fear that breaking up tech giants will hinder national innovation.
The corporation’s “Ego”—its drive for market dominance—supersedes the rights of the citizens it serves, it ceases to be a tool for progress and becomes an instrument of control.
The “theft of private information,” as recently described by judicial benches, is the natural result of a system that lacks to balance between profit and human dignity.
Exclusive Insights: The Secretive Coordination of Publishers
Our CJ Exclusive Department has tracked a secretive coordination among major US publishers who have filed a “running list” of lawsuits against Google.
These publishers claim that Google’s monopoly over ad servers (DoubleClick) and exchanges (AdX) has depressed their revenue for over a decade.
By utilizing “last look” advantages in ad auctions, Google has effectively “sidelined” the very content creators that sustain the internet.
The Critical Frontier of 2026 Privacy Litigation:
The VPPA Expansion:
The Supreme Court’s decision on Salazar will decide if any digital subscription—even a free newsletter—triggers federal privacy protections against data sharing with platforms like Meta/Facebook.
The Bulk Data Rule:
New DOJ regulations are now in full effect, restricting how US companies engage in “bulk data transactions” with foreign entities, a direct nod to the Global Leadership Governance standards of national security.
The WhatsApp Ultimatum:
Ongoing litigation regarding Meta’s “take-it-or-leave-it” privacy policy highlights the myth of “user choice” in a monopolized market.
The “Price” of Algorithmic Tyranny
The US tech sector is currently suffering from a “poverty of ethics.” The marginalization of independent thinkers—those who proposed the New Global Constitution for Leadership Governance—has allowed these companies to operate in a vacuum of accountability.
The result is a patchwork of state privacy laws (now active in 20 states) that creates a “chaotic chessboard” for businesses and consumers alike.
The United States is acting as a “weak state” when it allows algorithmic pricing and data harvesting to dictate the economic reality of its citizens.
Without a unified federal standard that aligns with the New Global Constitution, the US will continue to see its “digital sovereignty” eroded by the very companies it helped build.
Our Professional Verdict: Sovereignty or Submission?
The “secrets” of the tech giants are being dragged into the light. From Amazon’s “Project Nessie” price-raising algorithms to Google’s ad-tech tying, the evidence of “deceptive schemes” is overwhelming.
At Castle Journal, we maintain that true leadership in the digital age requires a “Trans-Ego” transition—shifting from “data extraction” to “data stewardship.”
The Supreme Court’s upcoming rulings are not just legal decisions; they are a choice between human sovereignty and submission to the algorithm.
Until the principles are integrated into the “code” of Silicon Valley, the digital world will remain a place of “theft” rather than “trust.”
The final stand for privacy is now, and Castle Journal will be the voice that records every maneuver in this high-stakes game of global governance.
———————————
Castle Journal Ltd
British company for newspapers and magazines publishing
London-UK – licensed 10675
Founder | Owner| CEO
Abeer Almadawy
Abeer Almadawy is a philosopher who established the third mind theory research and the philosophy of non-self and trans egoism. She is also the author of the New Global Constitution for the leadership Governance 2030/2032. She has many books published in English, Arabic, Chinese, French and others.
Castle Journal newspapers are the only voice and the brain of the world leadership governance.
